Which of the following is NOT a type of evidence in legal terms?

Counterfactual evidence is not recognized as a formal type of evidence in legal terminology. It refers to hypothetical scenarios that challenge the facts of a case by considering what could have happened under different circumstances. While this type of reasoning may be discussed in legal contexts, it does not constitute admissible evidence that can be presented in court.

In contrast, testimonial evidence involves statements made by witnesses under oath, providing direct accounts related to the case. Circumstantial evidence consists of indirect evidence that implies a fact but does not directly prove it, often requiring inferences to be drawn. Physical evidence refers to tangible objects that can be presented in court, such as documents, fingerprints, or weapons. Each of these forms of evidence plays a significant role in legal proceedings and can be essential for establishing facts of a case.